I have a difficult time seeing past the surface of things and reading into their true meaing. As an art major, I was expected to participate in discussions of student art in our studio classes, and to recognize and analyze patterns in my art history classes. It wasn’t until my final art history class that I began to understand how to interpret and talk about art. Unfortunately, it was the last class I took before graduating. Talking about art is still very difficult for me, but there was a time when I had a glimmer of understanding. I wish I could say the same for literature.
When it comes to literature (and poetry), I just don’t get it. I like to read, but my literature classes always made me feel bad. I always felt like I was missing something that was perfectly obvious to everyone else. It made me fearful of reading classic literature.
It’s this fear that’s made it difficult for me to declare a desire to read classic literature. What if I read something, but don’t really understand the true meaning? I’ve decided to take the pressure off myself and read for the sake of reading. People are allowed to enjoy art or music without thinking about them, so I’m taking that stance on literature. I think I could enjoy a lot of these stories, even without understanding them fully.
I searched my own bookshelves first and was surprised to find so many unread stories. I just read “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” for the first time ever. I didn’t even know I owned it! I have a collection of Edgar Allan Poe’s work which I will of course not understand, but which I have added to my reading list. I also found an old book from one of my literature classes which is filled with over a hundred short stories. I think I’ll try to force myself to read some of the books I dreaded/loathed in high school too, since they’re probably still on one of my shelves here somewhere.
This is the first time I’ve been excited to read classics. And if I don’t end up making the connection between Napoleon the Pig and Stalin? Oh well.

COMMENTS: 5 Comments